Download the full version of the article (PDF) Open Access
College of Computer Science and Mathematics, Physics Department, Tikrit University, 34001 Tikrit, Iraq

Structural, Optical, and Electrical Properties of Nano-Zinc Sulphide at 250°C

105–113 (2026)

PACS numbers: 68.37.Hk, 73.61.Ga, 78.20.Ci, 78.66.Hf, 78.67.Bf, 78.67.Pt

The thin films of zinc sulphide (ZnS) with nanograins are produced on (glass) substrates at 250°C using the spray-pyrolysis deposition technique (SPDT). The films have a polycrystalline cubic structure with preferred orientation along (111) direction of growth. The optical characteristics of the thin ZnS film indicate a direct optical energy gap of 3.320 eV. The film displays a thickness of 250.25 nm with grain sizes ranging from 9.76 nm to 11.46 nm. For approximate values, the measurements are done with the use of a computer simulation tool 'Hebal Optic'. It is also observed for all the films that there is an inverse proportional change in resistance to temperature and that the formed films have two activation energies.

KEY WORDS: software 'Hebal Optic', nano-ZnS, thiourea, energy gap, spray-pyrolysis deposition technique

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/nnn.24.01.0105

Citation:
Sabah S. Hamdi, Structural, Optical, and Electrical Properties of Nano-Zinc Sulphide at 250°C, Nanosistemi, Nanomateriali, Nanotehnologii, 24, No. 1: 105–113 (2026); https://doi.org/10.15407/nnn.24.01.0105
REFERENCES
  1. N. Imam and M. B. Mohamed, Superlattices and Microstructures, 73: 203 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2014.05.026
  2. W. K. Bae, J. Kwak, J. W. Park, K. Char, C. Lee, and S. Lee, Advanced Materials, 21, No. 17: 1690 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200801908
  3. Hanaa I. Mohammed, Iman H. Khdayer, and Iqbal S. Naji, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2372, No. 1: 090005 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0068737
  4. Jiaguo Huang and Kanyi Pu, Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 59: 11717 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202001
  5. W. Daranfed, M. S. Aida, A. Hafdallah, and H. Lekiket, Thin Solid Films, 518, Iss. 4: 10821084 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.227
  6. J. Ady, S. F. Umroati, S. Meliana, S. D. A. Ariska, and D. I. Rudyardjo, Nanosistemi, Nanomateriali, Nanotehnologii, 19, Iss. 3: 585 (2021); https://doi.org/10.15407/nnn.19.03.585
  7. A. Ateş, M. Kundakçı, A. Astam, and M. Yıldırım, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 40, Iss. 8: 2709 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2007.12.010
  8. S. Ilican, Y. Caglar, M. Caglar, and F. Yakuphanoglu, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 35, Iss. 1: 131 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2006.07.009
  9. Z. Zhao, M. Liu, K. Yang, C. Xu, Y. Guan, X. Ma, and F. Zhang, Advanced Functional Materials, 31, Iss. 43: 2106009 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202106009
  10. N. P. Huse, A. S. Dive, K. P. Guttu, and R. Sharma, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc., 67: 62 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2017.05.010
  11. K. Priya, V. K. Ashith, G. K. Roa, and G. Sanjeev, Ceramics. International, 43: 10487 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.094
  12. M. C. Lopez, J. P. Espinos, F. Martin, D. Leinen, and J. R. Ramos-Barrado, Journal of Crystal Growth, 285, Iss. 1-2: 66 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.07.050
  13. S. Mondal, S. Bhattacharyya and P. Mitra, Pramana, 80, Iss. 2: 315 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-012-0463-6
  14. C. F. Niedik, C. Freye, F. Jenau, D. Haring, G. Schroder, and J. Bittmann, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Dielectrics (ICD), 2: 1114 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1109/ICD.2016.7547814
  15. X. Huang, N. Hu, L. Zhang, L. Wei, H. Wei, and Y. Zhang, Synthetic Metals, 185: 25 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2013.09.034
  16. H. Wu, J. Yu, G. Yao, Z. Li, W. Zou, X. Li, and Z. Tang, Sensors and Actuators. B: Chemical, 369: 132195 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.01.070