Download the full version of the article (PDF) Open Access
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Homs University, Homs, Syria

Optimization of Biodiesel Production from Refined Oil Blend Using a Heterogeneous Nanoparticle Catalyst

1257–1270 (2025)

PACS numbers: 68.37.Hk, 81.16.Hc, 82.30.Vy, 83.80.Mc

This study focuses on optimizing biodiesel production from a refined blend of palm and cottonseed oils, utilizing the MCM-41 nanocatalyst. Palm oil biodiesel is noted for its excellent oxidative stability, but demonstrates poor low-temperature flow properties due to its high-saturated fatty acid content. In contrast, cottonseed oil biodiesel offers enhanced flow properties at low temperatures, but exhibits lower oxidative stability. By blending these two oils, this study aims to maximize biodiesel yield and achieve improved overall fuel properties. The esterification process is optimized using a traditional experimental approach, varying two parameters simultaneously, while maintaining the others constant. The critical variables studied include the molar ratio of alcohol-to-oil, catalyst amount, reaction temperature, and reaction time. The MCM-41 nanocatalyst, a mesoporous silica material with nanoscale features, is selected due to its high surface area, uniform pore distribution, and superior catalytic performance. This methodical approach simplifies the optimization process, reduces experimental complexity, and provides a practical framework for identifying optimal reaction conditions in resource-limited environments.

KEY WORDS: optimization, esterification, transesterification, MCM-41, biodiesel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/nnn.23.04.1257

Citation:
Heba Naseef, Reem Tulaimat, Seba Naseef, and Jasim Alebrahim, Optimization of Biodiesel Production from Refined Oil Blend Using a Heterogeneous Nanoparticle Catalyst, Nanosistemi, Nanomateriali, Nanotehnologii, 23, No. 4: 1257–1270 (2025); https://doi.org/10.15407/nnn.23.04.1257
REFERENCES
  1. Mingxin Guo, Weiping Song, and Jeremy Buhain, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42: 712 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.013
  2. Donato A. G. Aranda, Rafael T. P. Santos, Neyda C. O. Tapanes, André Luis Dantas Ramos, and Octavio Auqusto C. Antunes, Catal. Lett., 122, Iss. 1–2: 20 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-007-9318-z
  3. Luqman Razzaq, Shahid Imran, Zahid Anwar, Muhammad Farooq, Muhammad Mujtaba Abbas, Haris Mehmood Khan, Tahir Asif, Muhammad Amjad, Manzoore Elahi M. Soudagar, Nabeel Shaukat, I. M. Rizwanul Fattah, and S. M. Ashrafur Rahman, Energies, 13, Iss. 22: 5941 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225941
  4. G. Mutezo and J. Mulopo, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137: 110609 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110609
  5. M. E. Borges and L. Díaz, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, Iss. 5: 2839 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.071
  6. Qian Zeng, Zhen Song, Hao Qin, Hongye Cheng, Lifang Chen, Ming Pan, Yi Heng, and Zhiwen Qi, Catal. Today, 339: 113 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2019.03.052
  7. Shweta J. Malode, K. Keerthi Prabhu, Ronald J. Mascarenhas, Nagaraj P. Shetti, and Tejraj M. Aminabhavi, Energy Conversion and Management: X, 10: 100070 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2020.100070
  8. Umer Rashid, Muhammad Ibrahim, Shahid Yasin, Robiah Yunus, Y. H. Taufiq-Yap, and Gerhard Knothe, Ind. Crops Prod., 45: 355 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.12.039
  9. Kahraman Bozbas, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12, Iss. 2: 542 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.06.001
  10. Matt Johnston and Tracey Holloway, Environmental Science & Technology, 41, Iss. 23: 7967 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1021/es062459k
  11. Venkatesh Mandari and Santhosh Kumar Devarai, BioEnergy Res., 15, Iss. 2: 935 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-021-10333-w
  12. Mohd Aznan Abdul Latif, Ahmad Anas Yusof, Ahmad Zaki Shukor, Farah Aqilah Habidi, Nur Fathiah Mohd Nor, Mohd Zaid Akop, Mohd Hafidzal mohd Hanafi, and Aiman Roslizar, MATEC Web Conf., 90: 01046 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20179001046
  13. Anton A. Kiss, Alexandre C. Dimian, and Gadi Rothenberg, Energy Fuels, 22, Iss. 1: 598 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1021/ef700265y
  14. Ayhan Demirbas, Energy Convers. Manag., 50, Iss. 1: 14 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.09.001
  15. S. N. Yusof, S. M. Basharie, N. A. Sidik, Y. Asako, and S. B. Mohamed, J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci., 86, Iss. 2: 136 (2021); https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.86.2.136146
  16. Ahmad Abbaszaadeh, Barat Ghobadian, Mohammad Reza Omidkhah, and Gholamhassan Najafi, Energy Convers. Manag., 63: 138 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2012.02.027
  17. Lay L. Myint and Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 11, Iss. 1: 263 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-008-0156-5
  18. Ahmad Hafiidz Mohammad Fauzi, Nor Aishah Saidina Amin, and Ramli Mat, Appl. Energy, 114: 809 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.011
  19. V. N. Ariharan, V. N. Meena Devi, and P. Nagendra Prasad, Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci., 4, Iss. 2: 1336 (2013); https://www.rjpbcs.com/pdf/2013_4(2)/[145].pdf
  20. N. Saifuddin, K. Aisswarya, Y. P. Juan, and P. Priatharsini, J. Appl. Sci., 15, Iss. 8: 1045 (2015); https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2015.1045.1058
  21. Ming Chai, Qingshi Tu, Mingming Lu, and Y. Jeffrey Yang, Fuel Process. Technol., 125: 106 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.03.025
  22. T. Srinivasa Reddy and M. C. Santhosh Kumar, Ceram. Int., 42, Iss. 10: 12262 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.04.172